Gary
During a casual conversation, Gary’s accountant mentioned he had recently attended a seminar hosted by an investment company and had been impressed by what they were offering.
Interested in learning more, Gary arranged a meeting with a representative from the firm.
“The person I met with showed me all the appropriate credentials and a very impressive offering. He answered all my questions, and I felt confident that everything was above board,” Gary said.
Trusting the information presented and reassured by his accountant’s positive view, Gary went on to make three separate investments, totalling more than $200,000.
Initially, everything went according to plan. Interest payments were deposited regularly, reinforcing Gary’s confidence that he had made a sound decision.
That confidence was shaken when the payments suddenly stopped.
“I followed the investments very closely, so I immediately noticed when I didn’t receive a regular deposit. I called my representative and questioned what had happened and was assured he would look into it and get back to me,” Gary explained.
Unsatisfied with the lack of clear answers and growing concerned about the missing payments, Gary began the process of withdrawing his investments.
Unfortunately, he was too late.
The company had entered administration, leaving Gary, along with many other investors, facing significant losses.
“I was shocked, and I felt foolish. I had invested a portion of my money specifically for my children, and it was gone,” he said.
Gary lodged a complaint with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). During the process, he learned that the company had likely been trading while insolvent, potentially even before he made his first investment.
“I kept second-guessing myself, wondering if I’d missed signs that something wasn’t right. Short of flying to Melbourne and visiting the various land and commercial holdings myself, I don’t know what I could have done differently,” Gary said.
AFCA ultimately issued a determination in Gary’s favour, and he received compensation through the CSLR.
“I’m still out a significant amount; however, I’m appreciative that the Scheme was there to provide me with some relief.”
*Name changed for privacy
Related case studies
Richard
Having worked with several advisers over the years, including one whose poor advice led to significant financial losses, Richard was acutely aware of the importance of choosing carefully. Based on the firm’s strong reputation, Richard selected a large, well‑known financial services provider, believing this would ensure stability and steady growth for his retirement nest egg.
Travis and Susan
Despite extensive planning and careful due diligence, Travis and Susan started to question whether the financial advice they had received was in their best interests.
Hugo
After several years of having a financial firm manage his SMSF, Hugo decided to take back control and look after it himself. As he began going through the details of his account, he discovered that two of the funds in which he held significant investments had been frozen in 2020 and were now essentially worthless.
Carly
Carly's SMSF was managed by the same firm since 2012 and trusted their advice. In 2023, an authorised representative of the firm recommended she invest $50,000 in a high-yield fixed interest account. Carly soon learned the firm had no record of her investment.